Upcoming, i computed the possibility relationship ranging from these variables and sociocultural circumstances, because of the undertaking Chisquared assessment

Upcoming, i computed the possibility relationship ranging from these variables and sociocultural circumstances, because of the undertaking Chisquared assessment

To contrast the second theory, we very first recoded, each of the items into condition level, brand new percentage of solutions one show if husbands reduce, equal or maybe more ratings, namely, position, that have hypogamy, and therefore husbands keeps lower status than wives, homogamy, definition equivalent reputation, and you can hypergamy, definition husbands which have high updates than simply spouses. To the prospective organization of nation, analyses was indeed high inside the studies (X caribbeancupid 2 =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you may financial impression of a possible splitting up (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Research revealed that, having Foreign language professionals, there clearly was a lot more training hypogamy, while to have Dominican people there was a whole lot more education homogamy. Concerning economic affairs in case there are separation, because there is a whole lot more homogamy having Foreign language professionals, there clearly was more hypergamy having Dominicans (see Figure 1).

Which have previous failed marriages or not was not associated so you’re able to differences in updates. Concerning the possible connection between condition and you can decades partnered, tall connectivity have been utilized in fitness (X 2 =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to possess partners y is out there (forty.4%, each), to have people y exists (43.4%). This basically means, toward group with an increase of age partnered, husbands has actually all the way down fitness condition. Having people away from previous failed marriages and having college students out-of current relationships failed to somewhat apply at position.

When you look at the share, the fresh analyses concerning the second hypothesis showed that contrary to our very own criterion, the largest ability relevant to help you reputation is the country.

Univariate assessment found extreme differences in factor step 1 (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

In the long run, hypogamy points inside the The country of spain obtained notably lower than hypogamy points when you look at the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).